reading this again i probably should have clarified this a bit more in the dialogue; Scout has yet to have her first period, and coupled with the lack of sex characteristics in her androgynous blue superhuman form, it makes her suspect that her biology has been somehow atypical all along, that this other form was always inside her but only now has manifested. i guess it makes more sense once you've read more of the story but coming this early on without any frame of reference, i can see it being confusing as to what Scout is talking about.
it's touched on later in the story (and in her character bio) but in panel 2 Kyisha is referring to being intersex, noting a possible similarity between she and Scout. one thing that always bothers me in fiction is when the author highlights a character's "deviation" from the norm or from the basic "character template" and tries to let the audience know not only that this character is "different" but in what way, because the audience will be confused or not accept it or question it, thinking it's a metaphor or plot device or something. but having Kyisha and Scout emphasize or explain it for the readers would seem jarring, implausible, and even disrespectful. so i try to write dialogue like this from kind of a reader-unfriendly perspective, as i'd imagine the characters to really deal with it in regular conversation, because in the context of the story they're not having the conversation for the benefit of the third party watching them. they both know Kyisha is intersex and what is being said and implied, so why would they frame it in an implausibly expository way? i realize it's still a written fictional narrative, but i think this sort of believability goes a long way.
in panel 3, i like how incongruous Scout's miserable expression seems compared to what she's saying.